From The New York Times, March 29, 2007 (via soupsoup)
“The nation faces some very tough choices in coming years,” (Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr.) said. “That such a large share of the income gains are going to the very top, at a minimum, raises serious questions about continuing to provide tax cuts averaging over $150,000 a year to people making more than a million dollars a year, while saying we do not have enough money” to provide health insurance to 47 million Americans and cutting education benefits.
A major issue likely to be debated in Congress in the year ahead is whether reversing the Bush tax cuts would slow investment and, if so, how much that would cost the economy.
Mr. Greenstein’s organization will release a report today showing that for Americans in the middle, the share of income taken by federal taxes has been essentially unchanged across four decades. By comparison, it has fallen by half for those at the very top of the income ladder.
Ahh yes rhetoric thrown in the face of fact. You mean like your entire post here. My tumblog is life20.tumblr.com not...
Soup has much more patience for the use of rhetorical shorthand like uttering class warfare than I do. It’s one of...
SoupSoup I’m not...1% by any means whatsoever but I know class warfare when it’s staring...
“As of 2006, the United States had one of the highest levels of income inequality, as measured through the Gini index,...
How long is this going to continue?
When Progressivism has no where left to hide … ramp up the class warfare.Got a news flash for the media and Progressives...